Shoes for Crews files for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy amid intense competition

A well-presented slip-resistant shoe from Temu, priced at just . In contrast, Shoes for Crews’ slip-resistant shoes sell for as much as 5, illustrating the significant competition the company faces from such sites. Image: Temu
Shoes for Crews, a renowned manufacturer of slip-resistant footwear, has recently filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy. The company’s financial challenges stem from intense competition from online marketplaces like Temu, operated by a Chinese e-commerce company. Temu offers shoes they advertise as slip-resistant at prices as low as $17, with free shipping for orders that have a two-week wait time. In contrast, Shoes for Crews’ slip-resistant shoes are priced as high as $295, making it difficult for the company to compete in the evolving e-commerce landscape.
Headquartered in Florida, Shoes for Crews is struggling under significant financial pressure, with its assets valued at a minimum of $100 million but facing liabilities of at least $500 million. The company now seeks to sell its business to address its mounting debts. Despite employing 340 individuals and selling approximately four million pairs of shoes annually to a diverse clientele — ranging from restaurants and supermarkets to hotels, casinos, and healthcare providers — the company has been adversely affected by a combination of intensified competition, inflation, and the disruptive effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly on the hospitality industry.
Founded in 1984 by Stanley Smith and his son, Matthew Smith, Shoes for Crews started with a focus on providing slip-resistant shoes for Burger King restaurants. Leveraging the expertise of a chemist, the company developed a unique rubber outsole that contributed to its expansion into the European market. Today, Shoes for Crews operates in countries such as Ireland, Germany, the United Kingdom, France, Spain, and Italy.

A well-crafted slip-resistant shoe from Shoes for Crews, priced at 6.95, undoubtedly showcases superior quality and design. The company’s other slip-resistant shoes sell for as much as 5. However, Shoes for Crews now faces stiff competition from online sellers like Temu, who offer shoes they also claim to be slip-resistant for a fraction of the price. Image: Shoes for Crews
The company’s reputation for offering high-quality, purpose-built slip-resistant footwear has made it a trusted name in workplace safety. Shoes for Crews offers warranties of up to $5,000 against slip-and-fall accidents that occur on level surfaces due to water, grease, liquefied fats, or synthetic lubricants, demonstrating its commitment to protecting its customers.
As Shoes for Crews grapples with its financial difficulties, it is confronted with two potential avenues for survival:
Lowering Prices: One option for the company is to decrease its prices in an effort to compete with online sellers and attract budget-conscious consumers. This strategy would entail finding cost-efficient methods for manufacturing its high-quality shoes while still prioritizing safety and performance. Effective communication with customers would be crucial to highlight the advantages of Shoes for Crews’ products over cheaper alternatives.
Maintaining Higher Prices: Alternatively, Shoes for Crews could opt to uphold its higher price points and continue catering to customers who can afford them. This approach necessitates ongoing enhancements to product features and quality to justify the premium pricing. By focusing on specific market segments and emphasizing the safety and longevity of its footwear, the company could sustain its position as a frontrunner in slip-resistant shoes.

The collaboration between Shoes for Crews and DeWalt has resulted in this slip-resistant outsoled hiker-style safety boot — The DeWalt Torque. Such ongoing collaborations with major brands could be one of the keys to helping Shoes for Crews overcome its financial challenges. Image: Shoes for Crews
Another strategic avenue for the company is to collaborate with prominent shoe brands that already possess an established customer base and integrate their slip-resistant outsole technology into these brands’ products. As of now, Shoes for Crews has already formed alliances with several reputable companies, and continuing these collaborations could bolster its market standing. Companies they have allied with include New Balance, Dockers, DeWalt, Cole Haan, Puma, and others.
Ultimately, Shoes for Crews must carefully evaluate its options and develop a strategic plan to overcome its current challenges. By adapting to changing market dynamics and focusing on its core strengths, the company can strive to find a path forward and potentially emerge stronger from this period of financial difficulty.
Footwear Industry Articles
- Comrades Marathon 2025Because of its broad appeal and the number – 23 000 is the maximum allowed – and diversity of its participants, the Comrades is regarded as a key indicator of the popularity of running shoe brands in SA. Runners, who have to register by early December for the race in June the following year, are asked to fill in the brand ...moreThat bag goes on auctionThe original Hermès Birkin bag – more about capacity than style.The original Hermès Birkin bag, which acted as the blueprint for what would become one of the most desirable celebrity status symbols in the world, will be auctioned by Sotherby’s in Paris on 10 July.According to CNN, in 1984 actress and singer ...moreBoat shoes: Sales finally climbing in the US, but local suppliers say there’s no uptick hereUnder the headline “Boat shoes sales up for first time in 10 years — one year after fashion declared the style’s comeback”, Footwear News this month reported that boat shoe sales finally seeing an increase, “albeit a fraction of where the category once was in the 2010s”. ...more
Leather Industry Articles
- Country hides and skins: Changed markets for a forgotten sourceChanges in the global leather market have impacted most on the bottom rung of the leather value chain – ‘country’ hides and skins. This was starkly illustrated when S&V African Leather received a call from someone in the Eastern Cape who had previously made a living collecting them for sale to agents acting on behalf of hide and skin collectors. The agents were still there, he said, but they weren’t interested in buying what he had to offer. Where should he look?rnrn A call to trader Gareth Diesel in East London, who works for and with Elliott Brothers and its subsidiary, East London Abattoir, confirmed that market had died in the province.rnrn He suggested we ask Greg Feinberg, MD of SA’s biggest hide and skin trader, pickler and wet blue tannery, Cape Produce Company, for ‘the bigger picture’. ...moreESG PORTFOLIOSOver the past decade, Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) investing has experienced significant growth, driven by increasing awareness of sustainability issues and a desire for ethical investment options. However, recent years have seen a notable decline in ESG investments, raising questions about their future viability. ...moreEuropean Commission Confirms Country Risk Classification in preparation for EUDRAhead of the legal deadline of 30th June 2025, the European Commission has adopted the Implementing Act on the Country Benchmarking System under the EU Deforestation Regulation (EUDR), effective from 22nd May 2025. This regulatory step is a pivotal development in the EU’s ongoing environmental strategy, aiming to curb deforestation linked to commodity imports. ...more
PPE Industry Articles
- Consumer Protection Act marking – ‘beware faulty inspections’ warns importer who is R250 000 poorerPinetown, KZN, SA – Wholesaler and retailer Treadsafe cc, which had a container of 120 000 pairs of plain white cotton gloves held up last July by the National Consumer Commission for suspected contravention of the Consumer Protection Act (CPA), managed to get the container released – almost 3 months and around R250 ...moreUnderstanding respirator PPEThe subject of Respirator Personal Protective Equipment is confusing until one understands the basic concept requirements.OHS Act defines Respiratory Protective Equipment as a device which is worn over at least the mouth and nose to prevent the inhalation of air borne hazardous chemical substances and which is of a type or conforms to a s ...moreLengthy detentions: That’s just the way it is, says NCCS&V Protect asked the National Consumer Commission to comment on Treadsafe’s experience, and also whether other containers have been detained. Jabu Mbeje, Divisional Head: Enforcement & Legal Services, at the NCC, sent this response: ...more