New noise exposure regulations promulgated

Source: SINC
On 6th March 2025, The Dept of Employment & Labour published (Government Gazette No 52226), the new 2024 Noise Exposure Regulations which will replace the 2003 Noise-Induces Hearing Loss Regulations in 18-momths time. This 18-month period is being allowed, so we, the employers, have an 18- month period to achieve the new 2024 Noise Exposure Regulations requirements standard, before non-compliance Notices will be issued.
This new regulation was published together with a Code of Practice for Audiometry, and with accompanying Explanatory Notes to the Noise Exposure Regulations 2024, giving more details about the stricter Noise Exposure requirements & testing procedures.
Only four levels of Competent Audiometric Screening Test people are recognised, namely an ENT (ear, nose and throat specialist); a speech therapist; an audiologist or a Quality Assurance Body valid certificated Occupational Audiometric Screener. Only two levels of competent person may perform Diagnostic Audiology, namely, an ENT (ear, nose and throat) specialist and an Audiologist, if they are registered with the Health Professions Council of South Africa.
Furthermore, a Competent Person in Relation to Noise means a person who— (a) has, in respect of the work or task to be performed, the required knowledge, training (National Quality Framework Act Registered) and experience in noise and, where applicable, relevant qualifications specific to or including noise: and b) is also familiar with the Act and the applicable Regulations made under the Act.
These Regulations apply to any employer or self-employed person at any workplace under their control, where persons are exposed to continuous or impulse noise at or above either the noise-rating limit or the noise action level or inner damaging ototoxic chemicals or whole-body vibration. It also applies to a designer, manufacturer, importer or supplier of plant or machinery for use at a workplace. So, such plant and machinery needs to comply with the noise rating limits and action levels, too.
The Noise definitions are also changes to be related to more specific definitions. A "noise-rating limit" means the value of the 8-hour rating level at or above 85 dBA for continuous noise and/or peak noise level at or above 137 dBC for impulse noise at which specified actions or counter measures must be taken. (Note: Now dBA & dBC noise scales to be used)
The “noise action level" means the value of the 8-hour rating level at or above 82 dBA for continuous noise and/or the value of the peak noise level at or above 135 dBC for impulse noise at which specified actions or counter measures must be taken. (If I recall correctly, 3dBA difference in noise level, doubles of the sound intensity (power – volume?) and a 1.4-fold increase in sound pressure on the ear.)
The Regulation change also requires that an employer or self-employed person must, in respect of a workplace under their control, cause the noise exposure risk assessment to be:
(a) as far as is reasonably practicable, before exposure to noise.
(b) thereafter at intervals not exceeding 24-months; and (A new requirement)
(c) by a competent person.
Again, specific criteria must be considered when noise exposure risk assessments are performed.
Employers must establish documented medical screening programme for all employees (and vulnerable employees) exposed to noise at or above the Noise-Rating-limit or the Noise A Level. Such medical Screening must occur as an initial medical screening, as far as reasonably practicable, immediately before an employee commences employment; and (ii) subsequently, periodic medical screening at intervals recommended by the occupational medicine practitioner, but not exceeding 24-months.Furthermore, the employer must ensure that an exit medical screening is carried out by an occupational health practitioner, within 6-months prior to the termination or on termination of an employee’s employment. These records need to be available should an Occupational Disease (WCL 1 form for hearing loss) COIDAct claim be lodged.
There are further Regulations clauses addressing :Prevention or control of exposure to noise, Noise zones, Hearing protective devices, Maintenance of control measures, Records (of (i) training; (ii) noise exposure risk assessment and action plan; (iii) noise exposure monitoring and action plan; (iv) medical screening and medical surveillance records; and (v) maintenance of control measures records to be kept for a period of 40 years), Offences & penalties (involving a fine or up to 12 months imprisonment plus and R200/day additional fine or a day’s imprisonment for each day of continued offences.
Footwear Industry Articles
- Skechers goes private amid rising tariffsAs U.S. tariffs on Chinese imports climb to 125%, Skechers is stepping away from public markets to rethink its strategy. ...moreMixed messages from Deckers Brands resultsGoleta, California, USA (23 October 2025) – Hoka grew by 11.1% to US$634.1 million and Ugg grew by 10.1% to $759.6 million in Deckers Brands’ second fiscal quarter ended 30 September, the company announced.Sales of its ‘other brands’, now mainly Teva and Ahnu following the phase-out of its Koolaburra operations, de ...moreTifosi Sports: Moving on after OnRandburg, Gauteng, SA – Tifosi Sports “will be looking to establish a relationship with a meaningful international sports brand” when Swiss running shoe brand On moves to a new distributor in January, CEO Nick Zografos said last week. “We’re in discussions with a number of them.”Tifosi Sports has repres ...more
Leather Industry Articles
- Sam Setter's 'Pills': Brands remain holier than thouOn more than one occasion I have reported on brands being caught using illegal labour in their supply line. From what I understand several brands regularly, but indirectly, use illegal labour and of course always deny their knowledge of this happening. The problem is that everybody knows and nobody can prove this because the brands buy fr ...moreSam Setter's 'Pills': For readers who need some wry medicinal humourDevelopment aid: What happened in Ethiopia demonstrates that plans by governments, UNIDO and NGOs that don’t take into account economic realities will failWhat follows is just an example of many similar situations in the whole spectrum of development aid for the leather industry in a variety of countries and in Africa in particular. ...moreSam Setter's 'Pills': For readers who need some wry medicinal humourICLT – no need to mourn too muchRegretfully the University of Northampton decided in 2023 to close the Institute of Creative Leather Technologies, which in a variety of forms can be dated back to 1891. Apparently, the number of students declined over the years, the costs increased and the institution became unsustainable leading to ...more
PPE Industry Articles
- Updated safety footwear standards: No clarity after marathon meetingPretoria, Gauteng, SA – South African safety footwear manufacturers and importers will have to wait until 08 October to get answers from the National Regulator for Compulsory Specifications (NRCS) after a 3-hour, 30-minute Microsoft Teams ‘stakeholder meeting’ on 11September overran its timeslot – and that was afte ...moreThe Competency Dilemma: Determining Competency for Construction Health and Safety and Designations Outlined in the Construction Regulations (2014)IntroductionThere are substantial ambiguities and debates about the definition of a “Competent Person” when assigning legal appointments and responsibilities for supervision, oversight, and management of key tasks. These are outlined in the Construction Regulations (2014) of the Occupational Health and Safety Act of (1993). Va ...moreSurviving the safety footwear industry: The Simpsons meet ArmageddonProFit Safety Footwear national sales manager Nick Bryant was asked on his 45th birthday (20th of August) whether he still enjoys what he does for a living. “Absolutely. I love it. I live for it,” he replied. “And as for how… well, like most things in life, you need to have a serious passion for it… and an ...more





